I run the Vred 205/60 set at 15 PSI with 13 oz Ride-on on the back and Vred 175/55 set at 17 PSI with 8 oz Ride-on in each on the front. I used a Jaco digital inflator to air the tires and the same to check the pressures at the end. I weigh 145# and was carrying minimal cargo. This latest trip was 230 miles and the last leg was 60 miles after a brief fuel and pee break. When I checked the pressure first thing, I only got a 1.5 PSI increase on the front and a 2 PSI increase on the rear. The fronts are basically new and the rear is at .25 tread remaining. Do I dare reduce the pressure on these tires or is using Ride-on making the 4 PSI rule no longer valid? I have absolutely no issues with handling. Could it also be a validation on how well these tires are constructed?
-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
Question about the 4 PSI rule for tire inflation
- Thread starter jjc54
- Start date
Snoking1127
Well-known member
I run 16 in my Vredestein fronts and 18-19 in my General out back. I ride both single and two up. I do not bother balancing the tires. This is a picture of the weights I just took on this low mile Kenda rear on the new to me 2018 RTL.
^^ See above!
I haven't actually tested the tire temps either, but I'd think that by adding Ride-on to the mix, you've probably at least markedly skewed 'the 4psi rule of thumb'!
Do you think you really need the Ride-on??
I haven't actually tested the tire temps either, but I'd think that by adding Ride-on to the mix, you've probably at least markedly skewed 'the 4psi rule of thumb'!
Do you think you really need the Ride-on??
BajaRon
Well-known member
I can't speak for the OP, but if you're asking me, Peter, I'd say there are definite advantages (and 1 potential disadvante) to using Ride-On. I push hard for people to use the Automotive Ride-On even though Ride-On recommends the motorcycle version for the Spyder. Which makes absolutely no sense at all.^^ See above!
I haven't actually tested the tire temps either, but I'd think that by adding Ride-on to the mix, you've probably at least markedly skewed 'the 4psi rule of thumb'!
Do you think you really need the Ride-on??
EdMat
Well-known member
You have to remember it's a rule of thumb. Even if you disregard the Ride-on, you are lightly loaded and you don't mention the riding conditions. If you were riding hard in twisty conditions it would raise the pressure more than a leisurely cruise down some back roads. Based on my experience with the same tires you are too low in PSI already.
I use it because I don't like the spare tire that comes with the bike (Ha)! I think it does a decent job of balancing and the people that replace my tire can't balance it. I need the rear changed soon and can't wait to see his mood when i go pick it up. I understand that it is very water soluble. If I remember right, I got introduced to Ride-on from this site!^^ See above!
I haven't actually tested the tire temps either, but I'd think that by adding Ride-on to the mix, you've probably at least markedly skewed 'the 4psi rule of thumb'!
Do you think you really need the Ride-on??
BajaRon
Well-known member
Ride-On is supposed to extend the life of the tire. It will be interesting to see if that pans out for you.
Similar threads
